Title: Dweeb with Lit Pumpkin
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: Shirtless nerd with cybernetic implants
Notes: So, no shit, there I was, minding my own business, when a certain Birb appeared with a gift. Not to be outdone in this exchange of Halloween for Xmas, I offered another pinup slot. (They're cheap! Take two!) So, now you get some bonus Langly! :D
Continue reading »
Title: Chair Optional
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: Shirtless nerd
Notes: Sometimes, the floor is a more useful place to be. Right up until you need to get off it.
Continue reading »
Title: A Light in Radiant Darkness
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen/Sunless Skies
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: Shirtless dude with weird scars
Notes: One of these days, I'm gonna do Cosmogone Dreams!Langly correctly. Today is not that day. Goddamn the Neathbow colours are difficult to represent in a way that doesn't just make you go, 'ah yes, orange, lime green, and magenta', when you're aiming for cosmogone, viric, and violant. I think I might have gotten near violant. It's that touch of irrigo that makes it, I think…
Continue reading »
Title: The Fifth of Four
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: One shirtless nerd
Notes: I leave it to the viewer to figure out what's being counted.
Continue reading »
Title: No, the Other Other Screwdriver
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: One shirtless nerd
Notes: Had a three-way tie in the polls this month, and because I'm an asshole, I solved it by picking the one character all those options had in common: Langly. So, you know, you've enabled my birthday present to myself yet moar Langly every Monday, all month, including the Thedosian option and the legendary silverer of the High Wilderness. So, please enjoy my favourite disney princess looking for the other other screwdriver.
Continue reading »
Title: It's Not Bisexuality If It's Mind Control
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: John Byers ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: Boxers, socks, and necktie
Notes: He'd never once have thought it, if it wasn't for that one time with the psychic (and psycho, if you want Langly's opinion) ex. But, she did, and then he did, and every once in a while, he considers it again. Langly is not drunk enough for Byers's drama-soluble heterosexuality.
Continue reading »
Title: Unsubtle and Unapologetic
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: Langly ♂
Rating: G ( L0 N0 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: Bare shoulders and tasteless decor
Notes: It might be a little pink for his usual aesthetic, but hey, it's the distance between here and laid, innit?
Continue reading »
Title: Shitpost Venus
Fandom: The Lone Gunmen
Characters: John Byers ♂
Rating: M N3 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: There's cloth in most of the right places, but not all of them
Notes: You saw this coming. You had to have seen this coming. Shit, I had to make sure I hadn't done it before. Anyway, yes, I did spend two days staring at Botticelli's Birth of Venus for this one, and no, it's not The Same, for a lot of reasons, not least the eggshell. (But, I spent way too long capturing that mostly vacant expression.)
Continue reading »
Title: The Man, The Myth, The… Bunny?
Fandom: Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings:
Notes: Do not underestimate what this dumbass will do for a story.Â
Continue reading »
Title: Working Man vs Non-Working Parts
Fandom: Lone Gunmen
Characters: Richard Langly ♂
Rating: G- ( L0 N1 S0 V0 D0 )
Warnings: One shirtless dweeb.
Notes: Well, this month's poll came up tied Vexation with Manhammer Does Thedas, from which I could only determine y'all were just thirsty for Langly. I went with Vex, because I had some stupid ideas that came out poorly. But, this one's pretty solid! :D
I'm pretty sure we've all had that moment where you're in the middle of a build and you absolutely have four of those things, and …Â none of them are compatible.
Continue reading »
